Major concepts
and cases in communications law
-A study guide for Com. 407-
Introductory note: this list of key
concepts and landmark court decisions is offered as a study guide. It doesn't
include every case or concept that may be discussed in class or included
on a test, but it does cover most of the major ones. Use it as a starting
point for your review of the material.
CHAPTER ONE - THE LEGAL SYSTEM
Concepts
Structure of the California and federal courts
The rule of stare decisis
Types of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative, the common
law (note also the concept
of equity)
Steps in a lawsuit
Types of damages
Criminal and civil legal actions
Sources of information about the law
CHAPTER TWO - DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Concepts
The English tradition and Milton
Colonial America and the Zenger Case
The adoption of the First Amendment
Alien and Sedition Acts (1798)
1918 Sedition Act, the Smith Act and state sedition laws
Clear and present danger test
Cases
Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)
Schenck v. U.S., 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927)
Yates v. U.S., 354 U.S. 298 (1957)
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
(Note also U.S. v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310, 1990)
CHAPTER THREE - PRIOR RESTRAINT AND RELATED ISSUES
Concepts
Prior restraint and national security
Discriminatory taxation as a form of censorship
Literature distribution, soliciting and picketing rights
Censorship of government employees
"Hate speech" and the First Amendment
Cases
Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931)
New York Times v. U.S., 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
Taxation:
Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233 (1936)
Minneapolis Star and Tribune v. Commissioner of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575
(1983)
Arkansas Writer's Project v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221 (1987)
Texas Monthly v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1 (1989)
Leathers v. Medlock, 499 U.S. 439 (1991)
Jehovah's Witness cases:
Jones v. City of Opelika, 316 U.S. 584 (1942)
Lovell v. City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 (1938)
Schneider v. New Jersey, 308 U.S. 147 (1939)
Watchtower Bible and Tract Society v. Village of Stratton, 536 U.S.
150 (2002)
Other literature distribution and picketing cases:
Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 (1976)
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 23 C.3d 899 (1979), affirmed 447
U.S. 74 (1980)
Golden Gateway Center v. Golden Gateway Tenants Association, 26 C.4th
1013 (2001)
Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, 452 U.S.
640 (1981)
Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, 482 U.S. 569 (1987)
Lee v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, 505 U.S. 830
(1992)
Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988)
Madsen v. Women's Health Center, 512 U.S. 753 (1994)
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network, 519 U.S. 357 (1997)
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000)
Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists, 290 F.3d
1058 (2002)
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, 537 U.S. 393
Miscellaneous prior restraints:
U.S. v. National Treasury Employees Union, 513 U.S. 454 (1995)
R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992)
Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993)
Virginia v. Black, 123 S.Ct. 1536 (2003)
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston,
515 U.S. 557 (1995)
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000)
CHAPTER FOUR - LIBEL AND SLANDER
Concepts
How libel and slander differ
Elements of libel
Libel defenses
General, special and punitive damages
Actual malice and negligence
Public figures and private persons
Issues of public concern and private matters
Statements of fact and expressions of opinion
Confidential sources and libel
"Long-arm" jurisdiction
Summary judgment
Retractions
Anti-SLAPP laws
Cases
Major Supreme Court decisions:
New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and A.P. v. Walker, 388 U.S. 130 (1967)
Gertz v. Welch, 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
Time v. Firestone, 424 U.S. 448 (1976)
Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. 111 (1979)
Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153 (1979)
Bose v. Consumers Union, 466 U.S. 485 (1984)
Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984) and Keeton v. Hustler, 465 U.S.
770 (1984)
Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders, 472 U.S. 749 (1985)
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 (1986)
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986)
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990)
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, 501 U.S. 496 (1991)
California cases:
Vegod v. American Broadcasting Co., 25 C.3d 763 (1979)
Kilgore v. Younger, 30 C.3d 770 (1982)
Reader's Digest v. Superior Court, 37 C.3d 244 (1984)
Baker v. Los Angeles Herald Examiner, 42 C.3d 254 (1986)
Braun v. Chronicle Publishing Co., 52 C.A.4th 1036 (1997)
Khawar v. Globe International, 19 C. 4th 254 (1998)
Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity, 19 C.4th 1106 (1999)
******* CUTOFF POINT FOR EXAM #1 *******
CHAPTER FIVE - PRIVACY AND PUBLICITY
Concepts
Private facts
Intrusion/newsgathering torts
False light
Right of publicity/misappropriation
Inheritability of the right of publicity
Defenses and when they apply
Calif. Civil Code Sections 1708.8, 3344, 3344.1
Cases
The development and scope of privacy law:
Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co., 50 S.E. 68 (1905)
Katz v. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (reversing Olmstead v. U.S.)
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000)
Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S.Ct. ____ (2003)
Private facts cases:
Melvin v. Reid, 112 C.A. 285 (1931)
Briscoe v. Readers Digest, 4 C.3d 529 (1971)
Diaz v. Oakland Tribune, 139 C.A.3d 118 (1983)
Cox Broadcasting v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469 (1975)
Florida Star v. B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524 (1989)
Intrusion cases:
Deteresa v. ABC, 121 F.3d 460 (1997)
Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. 603 (1999)
Shulman v. Group W Productions, 18 C.4th 200 (1998)
Sanders v. ABC, 20 C.4th 907 (1999)
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)
False light cases:
Time Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967)
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing, 419 U.S. 245 (1974)
Fellows v. National Enquirer, 42 C.3d 234 (1986)
Misappropriation cases:
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977)
Sinatra v. Goodyear, 435 F.2d 711 (1970)
Midler v. Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460 (1988)
White v. Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395 (1992)
Astaire v. Best Film and Video, 136 F.3d 1208 (1998)
Comedy III Productions v. Saderup, 25 C.4th 387 (2001)
Winter v. DC Comics, 30 C.4th 881 (2003)
CHAPTER SIX - COPYRIGHTS AND TRADEMARKS
Concepts
What can and cannot be copyrighted
How to obtain a copyright
Remedies for infringement
Duration of copyrights and the public domain
Compulsory licensing
The Fair Use Doctrine
Copyright problem areas: music, computers, cable television, moral
rights, unpublished
works, "works made for hire"
1998 laws: Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Sonny Bono Act, Fairness
in Music
Licensing Act
International copyrights, the Berne Convention and GATT
Unfair competition
Trademarks and the Lanham Act
Internet names and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
Cases
International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918)
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
Harper & Row Publishers v. The Nation Enterpises, 471 U.S. 539
(1985)
BMI v. Claire's Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (1991) (note also: Edison
Brothers Stores v. BMI, 954 F.2d 1419, 1991, and
20th Century
Music v. Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 1975)
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001)
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
Wal-Mart v. Samara Brothers, 529 U.S. 205 (2000)
Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003)
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, 537 U.S. 418 (2003)
CHAPTER SEVEN - FAIR TRIAL-FREE PRESS
Concepts
The Sixth Amendment
Protective ("gag") orders
Sequestration, change of venue, continuances, etc.
Closing courtrooms during:
-trials
-preliminary hearings
-testimony of minors or sex crime victims
-jury selection
Rule 980 and cameras in court
Cases
Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961)
Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723 (1963)
Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966)
Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976)
Gannett v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368 (1979)
Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980)
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 (1982)
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501 (1984)
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1 (1986) (Note: these
are two different cases)
Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560 (1981)
NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV) v. Superior Court, 20 C.4th 1178 (1999)
CHAPTER EIGHT - REPORTER'S PRIVILEGE, SHIELD LAWS
AND CONTEMPT OF COURT
Concepts
Direct and indirect contempt
Civil and criminal contempt
Shield laws and reporter's privilege
Newsroom searches
Cases
Bridges v. California and Times-Mirror v. Superior Court, 314 U.S.
252 (1941)
Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972)
Cohen v. Cowles Media, 501 U.S. 663 (1991)
Farr v. Superior Court, 22 C.A.3d 60 (1971)
Farr v. Pitchess, 522 F.2d 464 (1975)
In re Farr, 36 C.A.3d 577 (1974) and 64 C.A.3d 605 (1976)
Mitchell v. Superior Court, 37 C.3d 268 (1984)
Delaney v. Superior Court, 50 C.3d 785 (1990)
New York Times Co. v. Superior Court, 51 C.3d 453 (1990)
Miller v. Superior Court, 21 C.4th 883 (1999)
CHAPTER NINE - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Concepts
Freedom of Information Act
Government in the Sunshine Act
Privacy Act of 1974
"Buckley Amendment"
Electronic FoI Act Amendments
Driver's Privacy Protection Act
Ralph M. Brown Act
Bagley-Keene Act
California Public Records Act
Information Practices Act
Access to prisons, disasters, etc.
Cases
ACLU v. Deukmejian, 32 C.3d 440 (1983)
Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court, 53 C.3d 1325 (1991)
Houchins v. KQED, 438 U.S. 1 (1978)
Daily Journal Corp. v. Superior Court, 20 C.4th 1117 (1999)
Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. 141 (2000)
Haynie v. Superior Court, 26 C.4th 1061 (2001)
California First Amendment Coalition v. Woodford, 299 F.3d 868 (2002)
******* CUTOFF POINT FOR EXAM #2 *******
CHAPTER 10 - OBSCENITY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Concepts
Pornography and freedom before 1957
The Roth test and the Miller test
National, statewide and local "community standards"
Zoning and adult businesses
Film censorship and the voluntary rating system
California Penal Code sec. 311
Communications Decency Act
Child Online Protection Act
Child Pornography Prevention Act
Children's Internet Protection Act
Cases
Defining obscenity and First Amendment rights:
Roth v. U.S., 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964)
Memoirs v. Massachusetts (the "Fanny Hill" case), 383 U.S. 415 (1966)
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
Jenkins v. Georgia, 418 U.S. 153 (1974)
Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 (1987)
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, 501 U.S. 560 (1991)
City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000)
Crawford v. Lungren, 96 F.3d 380 (1996)
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998)
U.S. v. American Library Assocation, 123 S.Ct. ____ (2003)
Obscenity, pornography and minors:
Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968)
New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982)
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990)
Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002)
Ashcroft v. ACLU, 535 U.S. 564 (2002)
Zoning and pornography:
Young v. American Mini-Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 (1976)
Schad v. Mt. Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (1981)
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, 475 U.S. 41 (1986)
City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, 535 U.S. 425 (2002)
CHAPTER 11 - BROADCASTING, CABLE AND NEW ELECTRONIC MEDIA
Concepts
The radio spectrum
History of federal regulation
The scarcity rationale
Structure of the FCC
The broadcast licensing and renewal process
-Preferences and EEO requirements
-Auctions and comparative hearings
-"Renewal expectancy"
Ownership restrictions (see Chapter 12)
-Radio/TV ownership rules
-Cross ownership rules
-Duopoly rules and LMAs
Equal time, access and lowest unit charges under Sec. 315 and 312(a)(7)
The Fairness Doctrine and the Personal Attack Rule
Specific content restrictions (e.g., lotteries, indecency, hoaxes)
Children's Television Act of 1990
Educational programs: 3-hour rule
Federal cable TV regulation and "ancillary jurisdiction"
Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992
Telecommunications Act of 1996
Retransmission consent/must carry
Local cable franchising and rate regulation
New technologies: HDTV, DBS, etc.
Satellite TV Home Viewers Act (1999)
Cases
Broadcast ownership and licensing:
Central Florida Enterprises v. FCC, 683 F.2d 503 (1982)
RKO General v. FCC, 670 F.2d 215 (1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 927 (1982)
Metro Broadcasting v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990) (Note also Adarand Constructors
v.
Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 1995)
Lamprecht v. FCC, 958 F.2d 382 (1992)
Bechtel v. FCC, 10 F.3d 875 (1993)
Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod v. FCC, 141 F.3d 344 (1998)
(see also MD/DC/DE Broadcasters v. FCC, 236 F.3d
13, 2001)
National Public Radio v. FCC, 254 F.3d 226 (2001)
Broadcast content regulation - fairness and equal time:
Red Lion v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969)
CBS v. Democratic National Committee, 412 U.S. 94 (1973)
FCC v. League of Women Voters of Calif., 468 U.S. 364 (1984)
Syracuse Peace Council v. FCC, 867 F.2d 654 (1989)
Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666
(1998)
Radio Television News Directors Assn. v. FCC, 229 F.3d 269 (2000)
Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn. v. U.S., 527 U.S. 173 (1999)
Broadcast content regulation - indecent content:
Pacifica Foundation v. FCC, 438 U.S. 726 (1978)
Action for Children's Television v. FCC, 58 F.3d 654 (1995)
Cable and new technologies regulation:
U.S. v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157 (1968)
Capital Cities Cable v. Crisp, 467 U.S. 691 (1984) (Note also City
of
New York v. FCC, 486 U.S. 57 (1988)
Turner Broadcasting v. FCC, 520 U.S. 180 (1997)
City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, 476 U.S. 488 (1986)
U.S. v. Playboy Entertainment, 529 U.S. 803 (2000)
CHAPTER 12 - ANTITRUST LAW AND MEDIA OWNERSHIP
Concepts
Federal antitrust laws
The Cartwright Act
Treble damages in antitrust cases
Price fixing, profit-pooling, tying arrangements, boycotts
Joint operating agreements and the Newspaper Preservation Act
The per se rule and the rule of reason
Broadcast ownership rules (see Chapter 11, above)
Cases
Associated Press v. U.S., 326 U.S. 1 (1945)
Lorain Journal v. U.S., 342 U.S. 143 (1951)
Times-Picayune v. U.S., 345 U.S. 594 (1953)
U.S. v. Kansas City Star, 240 F.2d 643 (1957)
Times-Mirror v. U.S., 274 F.Supp. 606 (1967), aff'd 390 U.S. 712 (1968)
U.S. v. Citizen Publishing, 394 U.S. 131 (1969)
FCC v. National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting, 436 U.S. 775 (1978)
U.S. v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (2001)
Fox Television Stations v. FCC, 293 F.3d 537 (2002)
Sinclair Broadcast Group v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027 (2002)
CHAPTER 13 - ADVERTISING: REGULATION AND ACCESS
Concepts
Commercial speech doctrine
Non-commercial corporate speech
The right to refuse advertising
Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914
Other federal laws affecting the FTC
FTC structure and procedures
The "unfairness doctrine"
California advertising laws
National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG)
Treble damages in advertising fraud cases
Cases
Commercial speech:
Valentine v. Chrestensen, 316 U.S. 52 (1942)
Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975)
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council v. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy,
425 U.S. 748 (1976)
Bates v. Arizona State Bar, 433 U.S. 350 (1977)
Central Hudson Gas and Electric v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S.
557 (1980)
Posadas de Puerto Rico v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico, 478 U.S.
328 (1986)
44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996)
Lorillard Tobacco v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001)
Gerawan Farming v. Lyons, 24 C.4th 468 (2000)
U.S. v. United Foods, 533 U.S. 405 (2001)
Kasky v. Nike, Inc., 27 C.4th 939 (2002)
Non-commercial corporate speech:
First National Bank v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978)
Consolidated Edison v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 530 (1980)
Access to the media:
Tornillo v. Miami Herald, 418 U.S. 241 (1974)
Federal advertising regulation:
Warner-Lambert v. FTC, 562 F.2d 749 (1977)
Morales v. TWA, 504 U.S. 374 (1992)
Pizza Hut Inc. v. Papa John's International, 227 F.3d 489 (2000)
CHAPTER 14 - FREEDOM OF THE STUDENT PRESS
Concepts
State action as opposed to private action
Permissible limits on campus freedom:
-at the high school level
-at the university level
-in private institutions
Calif. Education Code Section 48907
Cases
Tinker v. Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986)
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988)
Board of Regents v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000)
Kincaid v. Gibson, 236 F.3d 342 (2001)
<return to main page>
|